InterventionUse of and reactions to a tailored CD-ROM designed to enhance oncologist–patient communication: The SCOPE trial intervention☆
Introduction
Communication between patients and their oncologists is integral to high-quality cancer care. Effective communication is positively associated with patient satisfaction and treatment adherence [1], [2]. Numerous studies have also shown that patient–oncologist communication could be better, particularly in how oncologists respond to patient emotion [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Patients whose emotional needs are unmet experience more anxiety and diminished quality of life [1], [2], [9], [10]. However, few oncologists receive formal training in effective communication.
In response to this need, several training programs have been developed to improve oncologists’ communication. These programs generally involve days of intensive in-person training format including didactic instruction, interpersonal interaction, expert examples in live or videotaped format, and practice sessions, often with simulated patients. They have been found to improve communication [11], [12], [13] among those who attend, but the required time, travel, and expense associated with these programs limit access for many oncologists.
Through the SCOPE Trial (Studying Communication in Oncologist Patient Encounters), we developed an interactive, computer-based CD-ROM that focuses on addressing patient emotion and discussing prognosis. Rather than requiring attendance at a lecture or meeting, the CD-ROM can be mailed or hand delivered and used when convenient for the recipient. Therefore, if found effective, the SCOPE CD-ROM could be widely disseminated.
Two types of evaluation are important for assessing whether the SCOPE intervention warrants dissemination. The outcome evaluation (e.g., the educational impact of the intervention) will be assessed by whether use of the CD-ROM facilitates changes in oncologists’ skills and behaviors related to their communication with patients. Because the intervention cannot have any impact if oncologists do not use it and a positive impact is not likely if they do not like or find it helpful, it is also important to measure the process evaluation outcomes of usage and reactions—the extent to which oncologists in the study used the CD-ROM, liked it, and found it helpful.
It is common for studies of tailored health behavior change interventions to report both process and outcome evaluations and to include intervention exposure as a process measure. Indeed, one of the strong findings of the initial comparisons of tailored vs. non-tailored interventions has been that recipients are more likely to read “most or all” of tailored printed communications than of similar-looking non-tailored communications [14], [15], [16], [17], and that tailored print have more positive reactions, such as perceived relevance [17]. These process evaluations have also been conducted for tailored interventions delivered via interactive computer programs showing, for example, that they are likely to be used by groups such as older people and those with lower education levels as well as those who are more computer savvy [18], [19].
In contrast, studies of computerized medical education interventions have often reported process measures such as acceptability or satisfaction [20] but with some notable exceptions [21], [22], [23] they have rarely reported on proportion of the intended audience that used the intervention [20]. This may stem from study designs that do not lend themselves to calculating usage rates; most studies either implement computerized interventions into required coursework (therefore usage is nearly universal) or make information available over the web (where usage can often only be reported in absolute numbers rather than proportions due to lack of information about the denominator of potential users). This report contributes to the literature by reporting process outcomes of usage rates and reactions for a computerized medical education intervention that depends on voluntary usage.
Section snippets
Overview
The SCOPE Trial, described in detail elsewhere [24], is a randomized controlled trial conducted at Duke University and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in Durham, NC, and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pittsburgh, PA. The protocol was approved by each site's Institutional Review Board. Participants include patients with advanced cancer and the medical, gynecological, or radiation oncologists who provide their care.
Characteristics of participating oncologists
As shown in Table 4, the 24 participating oncologists who were assigned to the SCOPE intervention group were primarily white and male, with mean age just under 50 and, on average, close to 20 years post-fellowship.
Use of the CD-ROM
Of these 24 intervention group participants, 18 (75%) used the CD-ROM while connected to the internet, allowing for verification of their CD-ROM use. Among the 6 (25%) for whom we do not have verified data via their computer uploads, 3 (12.5%) reported having used the CD-ROM's
Discussion
The SCOPE intervention seeks to take theory-based training that has been successful in seminar classroom-style delivery and use interactive multimedia (voice-overs, video, and print) to provide similar training through a self-directed CD-ROM format that depends on voluntary use. The main outcome evaluation for the SCOPE trial will be is its education impact—whether use of the CD-ROM facilitates changes in oncologist communication with patients as indicated by their conversations recorded pre-
Acknowledgments
The authors thank participating oncologists and patients for allowing their conversations to be recorded and oncologists for their willingness to receive feedback. We also thank Sandra Blankenship for her help in preparing this manuscript.
References (33)
- et al.
Communication about the ending of anticancer treatment and transition to palliative care
Ann Oncol
(2004) - et al.
Efficacy of a Cancer Research UK communication skills training model for oncologists: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2002) Can communication skills be taught?
Brit J Hosp Med
(1990)Effective physician–patient communication and health outcomes: a review
CMAJ
(1995)- et al.
See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders
Arch Intern Med
(1996) - et al.
Communicating with realism and hope: incurable cancer patients’ views on the disclosure of prognosis
J Clin Oncol
(2005) Beyond advance directives: importance of communication skills at the end of life
J Am Med Assoc
(2005)- Foley KM, Gelband H, National Cancer Policy Board (U.S.), NRC. Improving palliative care for cancer: summary and...
- et al.
Oncologist communication about emotion during visits with patients with advanced cancer
J Clin Oncol
(2007) Approaching death: improving care at the end of life—a report of the Institute of Medicine
Health Serv Res
(1998)
Physician–patient communication. A key to malpractice prevention
J Am Med Assoc
Facilitating the use of noninvasive pain management strategies with the terminally ill
Hosp J
Efficacy of communication skills training for giving bad news and discussing transitions to palliative care
Arch Intern Med
Improving dietary behavior: the effectiveness of tailored messages in primary care settings
Am J Public Health
The effects of computer-tailored smoking cessation messages in family practice settings
J Fam Pract
Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference?
Am J Public Health
Cited by (15)
Empathy and boundary turbulence in cancer communication
2021, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :CPM describes complex behaviors and provides a framework for clinicians to understand communication and emotions--their own and their patients [22,23]. Several interventions have been shown to improve communication skills among primary care physicians and oncologists [47,48,59–64]. Communication training has been a central feature of primary care education, focusing, for example, on active listening, better response to cues, concerns, emotion expression, and empathy [52,60].
Teen CHAT: Development and utilization of a web-based intervention to improve physician communication with adolescents about healthy weight
2013, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :Given these limitations, we developed Teen CHAT, a personalized, online, training program to enhance MI behaviors in physician counseling for overweight and obese adolescents. We partly modeled the intervention after one we had previously developed for oncologists to address patient emotion [17] which doubled the times oncologists responded empathically to a patient expression of negative emotion and also was related to higher patient trust [18]. Here we describe the basic structure of the Teen CHAT study, the theoretical basis of the intervention, content development and format of the intervention, and describe physician use of and satisfaction with the intervention.
Process outcomes from a randomized controlled trial comparing tailored mammography interventions delivered via telephone vs. DVD
2011, Patient Education and CounselingCitation Excerpt :For exposure, women must either interact with the telephone interventionist or use the mailed DVD. Intervention studies often report both process and outcome evaluations [10]. Measuring exposure is important for interventions that require voluntary action (i.e., mailed interventions).
What constitutes quality of family experience at the end of life? Perspectives from family members of patients who died in the hospital
2015, Palliative and Supportive CareMobile technology-based (mLearning) intervention to enhance breast cancer clinicians' communication about sexual health: A pilot trial
2021, JNCCN Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- ☆
This work was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01-CA100387-01).