| |
Article Title |
Author(s) |
Pages |
|
|
|
Editorial Board
|
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
Extending the reach, effectiveness, and efficiency of communication: Evidence from the centers of excellence in cancer communication research
22 November 2010
At the turn of the century, the U.S.-based National Cancer Institute (NCI) included a section in its annual budget proposal identifying “cancer communications as an area of “extraordinary opportunity”...
|
Bradford William Hesse,
Lenora Eulene Johnson,
Kia LaTrece Davis
|
S1-S5
|
|
|
|
Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women
11 November 2010
Abstract: Objective: Compare effects of narrative and informational videos on use of mammography, cancer-related beliefs, recall of core content and a range of reactions to the videos. Method: African...
|
Matthew W. Kreuter,
Kathleen Holmes,
Kassandra Alcaraz,
Bindu Kalesan,
Suchitra Rath,
Melissa Richert,
Amy McQueen,
Nikki Caito,
Lou Robinson,
Eddie M. Clark
et al.
|
S6-S14
|
|
|
|
Women's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: A structural equation analysis
17 September 2010
Abstract: Objective: Compare the immediate affective and cognitive reactions to cancer survivor stories about mammography and breast cancer vs. a didactic, informational approach. Methods: Participant...
|
Amy McQueen,
Matthew W. Kreuter
|
S15-S21
|
|
|
|
Comparing the use of evidence and culture in targeted colorectal cancer communication for African Americans
11 August 2010
Abstract: Objective: This study examined the effects (affective reactions, cognitive reactions and processing, perceived benefits and barriers and intent to screen) of targeted peripheral+evidential (...
|
Vetta L. Sanders Thompson,
Bindu Kalesan,
Anjanette Wells,
Sha-Lai Williams,
Nicole M. Caito
et al.
|
S22-S33
|
|
|
|
Perceptions of care coordination in a population-based sample of diverse breast cancer patients
15 November 2010
Abstract: Objective: To identify factors associated with perceptions of care coordination in a diverse sample of breast cancer patients. Methods: Breast cancer patients reported to the metropolitan SE...
|
Sarah T. Hawley,
Nancy K. Janz,
Sarah E. Lillie,
Christopher R. Friese,
Jennifer J. Griggs,
John J. Graff,
Ann S. Hamilton,
Sarika Jain,
Steven J. Katz
et al.
|
S34-S40
|
|
|
|
Expression and reception of treatment information in breast cancer support groups: How health self-efficacy moderates effects on emotional well-being
02 November 2010
Abstract: Objectives: To examine the effects of exchanging treatment information within computer-mediated breast cancer support groups on emotional well-being, and to explore whether this relationship...
|
Kang Namkoong,
Dhavan V. Shah,
Jeong Yeob Han,
Sojung Claire Kim,
Woohyun Yoo,
David Fan,
Fiona M. McTavish,
David H. Gustafson
et al.
|
S41-S47
|
|
|
|
Mediating processes of two communication interventions for breast cancer patients
16 November 2010
Abstract: Objective: Test whether three mediating processes of Self-Determination Theory are involved in intervention effects on quality of life for breast cancer patients. Methods: A randomized clini...
|
Robert P. Hawkins,
Suzanne Pingree,
Bret Shaw,
Ronald C. Serlin,
Chris Swoboda,
Jeong-Yeob Han,
Cindy L. Carmack,
Andrew Salner
et al.
|
S48-S53
|
|
|
|
Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: Results from a population-based survey
11 October 2010
Abstract: Objective: There is much research describing cancer patients’ information needs and their use of the Internet, print media, and other sources to fulfill these needs. Yet little is known abou...
|
Rebekah H. Nagler,
Stacy W. Gray,
Anca Romantan,
Bridget J. Kelly,
Angela DeMichele,
Katrina Armstrong,
J. Sanford Schwartz,
Robert C. Hornik
et al.
|
S54-S62
|
|
|
|
Internet use leads cancer patients to be active health care consumers
04 October 2010
Abstract: Objective: This study examines whether cancer patients’ Internet use leads them to prefer a more active role in medical decision making and whether the effects of Internet use on active part...
|
Chul-joo Lee,
Stacy Wang Gray,
Nehama Lewis
|
S63-S69
|
|
|
|
Effective or ineffective: Attribute framing and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine
20 September 2010
Abstract: Objective: To experimentally test whether presenting logically equivalent, but differently valenced effectiveness information (i.e. attribute framing) affects perceived effectiveness of the ...
|
Cabral A. Bigman,
Joseph N. Cappella,
Robert C. Hornik
|
S70-S76
|
|
|
|
Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions
15 September 2010
Abstract: Objective: In 1996, 2001, and 2010, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group released criteria for reporting critical information about randomized clinical trials . The...
|
Timothy B. Baker,
David H. Gustafson,
Bret Shaw,
Robert Hawkins,
Suzy Pingree,
Linda Roberts,
Victor Strecher
et al.
|
S77-S86
|
|
|
|
Risky feelings: Why a 6% risk of cancer does not always feel like 6%
26 August 2010
Abstract: Objective: Emotion plays a strong role in the perception of risk information but is frequently underemphasized in the decision-making and communication literature. We sought to discuss and p...
|
Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher,
Angela Fagerlin,
Peter A. Ubel
|
S87-S93
|
|
|
|
Caregivers’ participation in the oncology clinic visit mediates the relationship between their information competence and their need fulfillment and clinic visit satisfaction
29 September 2010
Abstract: Objective: Caregivers maintain critical roles in cancer patient care. Understanding cancer-related information effects both caregiver involvement and ability to have needs met. This study ex...
|
Lori L. DuBenske,
Ming-Yuan Chih,
David H. Gustafson,
Susan Dinauer,
James F. Cleary
et al.
|
S94-S99
|
|
|
|
Designing for diffusion: How can we increase uptake of cancer communication innovations?
10 November 2010
Abstract: Objective: The best innovations in cancer communication do not necessarily achieve uptake by researchers, public health and clinical practitioners, and policy makers. This paper describes de...
|
James W. Dearing,
Matthew W. Kreuter
|
S100-S110
|
|
