Short communication
Communication skills teaching in Brazilian medical schools: What lessons can be learned?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.12.021Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study was performed with 162 of 237 accredited Brazilian Medical schools (MS).

  • Out of 162 MS, 104 (64.2%) had formal Communication skills (CS) training.

  • The CS programs generally were offered in the pre-clinical years.

  • Only 7 MS had CS as a longitudinal course over all medical training.

  • The only content unique to Brazil CS training is the “acolhimento”.

Abstract

Objective

To assess current practices in communication skills (CS) teaching in Brazilian medical schools (MS), looking for similarities and differences with other countries.

Methods

This study was performed with 162 out of the 237 accredited Brazilian MS (68.35%). The quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using content analysis.

Results

104 MS (64.2%) reported formal CS training. CS were more commonly taught in the pre-clinical years, by physicians and psychologists. Compared to other countries, Brazil was unique in offering training for “acolhimento” (“embracement”), which is a Brazilian Government strategy that requires that all those connected with healthcare delivery, from administrators to practitioners, and all allied health personnel “embrace” a dedication to caring for patients and the communities in which they live.

Conclusions

Formal CS teaching in Brazilian MS is less frequently seen in MS curriculum compared to reported data from other countries. The CS teaching of “embracement” is unique to Brazil.

Practice implications

This study adds to the literature by identifying the CS teaching of “embracement” in Brazilian MS, which could be considered outside Brazil.

Introduction

Physician-patient communication is at the core of medical practice with evidence-based studies demonstrating that effective communication skills (CS) improve patients’ medical and psychological outcomes, as well as patient and physician satisfaction [[1], [2], [3], [4]].

Guidelines and consensus papers support systematic communication training of medical and allied health professionals [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]]. Since the 1990′s, many medical schools (MS) worldwide have adopted formal CS curricula. Systematic reviews describe effective interventions for teaching and learning CS [12,13].

The world has become increasingly interconnected and interdependent, and educational systems can improve by sharing their teaching programs with each other [14].

After a literature review of comprehensive national surveys of the CS teaching curricula, published surveys from only three countries were found: US [15], UK [[16], [17], [18]] and Spain [19]. In the US, by 1999, 95.6% of the MS reported teaching CS [15]. In the UK, by 1998, almost all MS reported teaching CS [18]. In Spain, by 2005, 71.4% MS reported teaching CS [19]. We found no comprehensive Brazilian survey of CS curricula.

Since 2001, the Brazilian guidelines for undergraduate medical education (BGUME) have required that CS be taught in Brazilian MS [20,21]. Brazil is a vast country, highly diverse in terms of geography, demographics, culture, as well as socioeconomic and health conditions [22,23]. The Brazilian National Health System, the Unified Health System (SUS, as per the Portuguese acronym for Sistema Único de Saúde) provides free access to equal, humanistic and comprehensive healthcare to the entire Brazilian population [23,24]. One strategy to implement SUS principles is the “acolhimento” (translated into English as “embracement”). It requires that all those connected with healthcare delivery “embrace” a dedication to caring for patients and the communities in which they live [[25], [26], [27]]. Brazilian physicians are expected to communicate effectively with the multiprofessional teams, patients, families, and community members.

We wondered, given the imperative to teach CS in Brazilian MS, about the current status of CS teaching in Brazil. In what ways are the curricula responsive to the healthcare system demands? What specific skills and topics are being taught that might be unique to Brazil, but might be of interest to educators in other countries?

In order to answer these questions, we conducted a national survey to assess current practices in CS teaching in Brazilian MS, looking for similarities and differences with other countries.

Section snippets

Study design and participants

This survey was conducted after approval of the research project by the Federal University of Santa Catarina Research Ethics Committee (protocol No. 551.143//2014, CAEE: 25541213.7.0000.0121), from January 2015 to June 2016. The participants were representatives of all 237 Brazilian MS registered in the national information database on Higher Education Institutions’ electronic system, available at http://emec.mec.gov.br. The deans of the medical courses on the institution’s website were

Communication skills programs

The response rate for the survey was 68.3% (162 schools); 104 among them (64.2%) offered formal CS training. The distribution of 413 CS programs offered by these MS, by curriculum design and stage of the course is presented in Table 1. The programs were generally offered in the pre-clinical years. Only 7 MS had CS as a longitudinal course over the pre-clinical and clinical years of training.

Teachers involved in CS training and CS content and their teaching methods

The CS programs were frequently taught by physicians, mostly those in internal medicine (n = 83, 79.8%),

Discussion

When compared to the US and UK MS, it is evident that Brazil has less adherence to the BGUME. In the US, an important driver for the incorporation of CS into MS core curricula was the Liaison Committee on Medical Education requirement of CS for school accreditation [28], and the requirement of the National Board of Medical Examiners, as a condition of licensure that all graduating medical students pass a standardized patient Objective Structured Clinical Examination evaluating CS [29]. In the

Informed consent and patient details

We confirm all personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the persons described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies, the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina (Foundation for Research Support of Santa Catarina) that granted Rafaela Liberali a doctoral scholarship, and to all Brazilian Medical School representatives that participated in the study. We are also grateful to the Associação Brasileira de Educação Médica (Brazilian Medical Education Association) and the Foundation for Advancement of International Medical Education and Research (FAIMER) for their

References (31)

  • A. Bredart et al.

    Doctor-patient communication and satisfaction with care in oncology

    Curr. Opin. Oncol.

    (2005)
  • G. Makoul

    Essential elements of communication in medical encounters: the Kalamazoo consensus statement

    Acad. Med.

    (2001)
  • S. Kurtz et al.

    Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary–Cambridge guides

    Acad. Med.

    (2003)
  • J.R. Frank

    The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework: Better Standards, Better Physicians, Better Care

    (2005)
  • M. von Fragstein et al.

    UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education

    Med. Educ.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Communication Apprehension Among Health Professions Students in Brazil

      2022, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
    • Perceptions of nurses, pharmacists and physicians about medication reconciliation: A multicenter study

      2020, Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some authors justify that unfamiliarity of the roles of each professional within the health team can cause communication problems and hinder collaborative practices that optimize patient care (Garth et al., 2018; Van Sluisveld et al., 2012). Among other factors, this can be explained due to the fact that interprofessional communication is not sufficiently fostered during undergraduate health programs in Brazil (Araújo et al., 2019; Liberali et al., 2018). However, other studies reinforce the need to invest in training “with, from and about” interprofessional collaboration from undergraduate programs to residency, which can reinforce the idea of complementarity and synergy of the health team's actions (Anderson et al., 2017; Brock et al., 2013; Hayward et al., 2000).

    • Communication skills training in undergraduate nursing programs in Spain

      2020, Nurse Education in Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      The representation of communication skills teaching in the curriculum of Health Sciences has not been systematically studied yet, especially in Spanish-speaking countries (Ferreira Padilla et al., 2015; Moore et al., 2013). Studies analyzing the process of teaching communication skills and the specific weight of this competence in curricula seems to be more developed in medicine than in nursing both in Spain (Ferreira-Padilla et al., 2016; Ferreira Padilla et al., 2015) than in other countries (Liberali et al., 2017). However, with the establishment of the EHEA there seems to be a certain interest in guaranteeing the ability of the student to communicate fluently with people, families and communities, as well as providing an optimal emotional support (ANECA, 2004, 2005).

    View full text