Principles of effective communication with patients who have intellectual disability among primary care physicians

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2017.01.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Familiarity with intellectual disability increased utilization of effective communication principles.

  • Some physicians perceived patients with intellectual disability as unable to make their own healthcare decisions.

  • Attitude of physicians is a main predictor of their communication patterns with patients.

Abstract

Objective

Examine physicians’ implementation of effective communication principles with patients with intellectual disabilities (ID) and its predictors.

Methods

Focus groups helped construct a quantitative questionnaire. The questionnaire (completed by 440 physicians) examined utilization of effective communication principles, attitudes toward individuals with ID, subjective knowledge and number of patients with ID.

Results

Subjective knowledge of ID and more patients with ID increased utilization of effective communication principles. Provision of knowledge that allows patients to make their own medical decisions was predicted by more patients with ID, lower attitudes that treatment of this population group is not desirable, less negative affect and greater perception that treatment of this group is part of the physician's role. Effective preparation of patients with ID for treatment was predicted by higher perception of treatment of this group as part of the physician's role, lower perception of this field as undesirable and higher perception of these individuals as unable to make their own choice. Simplification of information was predicted by a greater perception of treatment of this group as part of the physician's role and more negative affect.

Conclusion

Greater familiarity may enhance care for these patients.

Practice implications

Increase exposure to patients with ID within training.

Introduction

Intellectual disability (ID) is a disability characterized by significant limitations in both intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior, which covers many everyday social and practical skills. This disability originates before the age of 18 [1]. Since the 1990s, in line with the social model of disability, individualization, participation, normalization and inclusion have been the main principles of care for people with intellectual disability (ID) [2]. In line with this, article 25 of the United Nations’ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) states that: “Parties recognize that persons with disabilities have the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health without discrimination on the basis of disability. Parties shall provide persons with disabilities with the same range, quality and standard of free or affordable health care and programs as provided to other persons” [3]. Although people with ID often have more health problems than the general population, [4], [5] these individuals, and their families, face many obstacles in seeking basic health care. Few providers receive specific training for treating this population and the health service systems in many countries offers few incentives to ensure appropriate health care for these patients. Consequently, studies have shown that individuals with ID frequently receive poorer health treatment [6]. In line with this, patients with ID have complained about the quality of communication with their physician, feeling that they are frequently misunderstood [19], [28]. In addition, it has been shown that frequently the ability of an individual with ID to make a healthcare decision is not taken into concern while parents and professionals make these decisions on their behalf [16]. The 2001 report of the US National Institute of Health identified six main goals for improving health care of this population, which included improving the knowledge, understanding and training of health care providers [7].

Many barriers to the provision of primary care for people with ID relate to problems in exchanging health information between the patient and the primary physician. Part of the problem is related to ineffective communication between the patient with ID and the treating physician [8]. This is also true in the general population where negative assessments of physician communication skills are associated with higher general dissatisfaction with the physician [9]. However, the difficulties related to poor communication are more likely when the patient has ID.

Very few attempts have been made to map communication principles with patients with ID. Using relatively small samples and mainly qualitative research techniques, these studies have led to the development of preliminary guidelines for effective communication principles with patients with ID. These include: (1) focusing on the abilities of the individual and not the disability, (2) developing a trusting relationship, (3) keeping eye-contact and speaking directly with the patient using speech that is adequate to the patients’ age, (4) asking for the patient's permission before involving their support figure, (5) as much as possible, gathering the medical history from the patient him/herself, (6) making sure the patient knows that at any stage he can ask his support figure to leave the room, (7) using a variety of communication techniques in order to fit the patient's understanding, (8) making sure the physician has sufficient time for the practice visit, (9) explaining and demonstrating procedures before starting any physical examination [10], [11], [12], [19]. Though these guidelines are very important, little research has examined their actual implementation and utilization by the primary care physician. Further, previous research has not examined how attitudes held by physicians may impact on the implementation of these communication principles. The aim of this study was to examine primary care physicians’ implementation of effective communication principles with patients who have ID and its predictors. The correlates examined in this study are mapped in Fig. 1.

Section snippets

Study design

This was a mixed methods study based on qualitative and quantitative research methods. First, qualitative focus groups (N = 4) and interviews (N = 13) were held with four groups of informants: individuals with ID, parents of individuals with ID, direct care takers and physicians in order to elicit effective communication principles. Adults with ID and direct care takers were a convenience sample recruited from residential settings for persons with ID. Parents of adults with ID were a convenience

Description of study population

Participants in the qualitative phase were six adults with mild to moderate ID, nine parents of adults with ID, three direct care takers and seven primary care physicians who were experienced in the ID field. Participants in the quantitative phase were a representative sample of 440 primary care physicians who work within Maccabi Health Maintenance Organization in Israel (35% of all physicians within Maccabi HMO). Of these physicians, 255 (58.0%) were male, the average age was 52.3 (SD = 11.2).

Discussion

Findings from this study provide additional support and expand upon the effective communication principles that have been mapped in previous studies [10], [11], [12], [19]. Specifically, findings provide support for the importance of simplifying information to the patient by speaking directly to the patient and adapting speech to the patients’ understanding and using a variety of techniques such as gestures and body language. Second, results point to the importance of preparing the patient

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.

Informed consent

I confirm all personal identifiers have been removed so that the persons described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.

Acknowledgment

The research was supported by a grant from the Israel National Institute for Health Policy Research (grant number R/65/2012).

References (28)

  • M. Mastebroek et al.

    Health information exchange in general practice care for people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative review of the literature

    Res. Dev. Disabil.

    (2014)
  • N. Devi et al.

    Moving towards substituted or supported decision-making? Article 12 of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities

    Eur. J. Disabil. Res.

    (2011)
  • R.B. Schalock et al.

    Intellectual Disability: Definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports

    (2010)
  • M.L. Wehmeyer et al.

    Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation

    Am. J. Ment. Retard.

    (1996)
  • Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Resolution (adopted by the UN General Assembly, A/RES/61/106...
  • S.A. Cooper et al.

    People with intellectual disabilities: their health needs differ and need to be recognized and met

    Br. Med. J.

    (2004)
  • H.M.J. van Schrojenstein Lantman-de-Valk et al.

    Managing health problems in people with intellectual disabilities

    Br. Med. J.

    (2008)
  • D.A. Ervin et al.

    Healthcare for persons with intellectual and developmental disability in the community

    Front. Public Health

    (2014)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

    Closing the Gap: A National Blueprint for Improving the Health of Persons with Mental Retardation, Report of the Surgeon General's Conference on Health Disparities and Mental Retardation

    (2001)
  • E.A. Platonova et al.

    Patient assessment of primary care physician communication: segmentation approach

    Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur.

    (2015)
  • I. Iacono et al.

    Patients with disabilities and complex communication needs

    Aust. Fam. Physician

    (2004)
  • N. Lennox et al.

    Management Guidelines: Developmental Disability

    (2005)
  • M. Wullink et al.

    Doctor–patient communication with people with intellectual disability: a qualitative study

    BMC Fam. Pract.

    (2009)
  • S. Werner et al.

    Psychiatrists’ knowledge, training and attitudes regarding the care of individuals with intellectual disability

    J. Intellect. Disabil. Res.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (10)

    • Clinician perspectives on the need for training on caring for pregnant women with intellectual and developmental disabilities

      2022, Disability and Health Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lastly, these findings suggest a need that tools to support clinicians may be helpful when caring for women with IDDs. Previous research cites poor communication as an impediment to the provision of high-quality health care.39–42 While reports of communication challenges likely reflect clinicians' lack of skill in effectively communicating with women with IDDs, effective communication for patients with IDDs is critical to ensuring their reproductive rights.

    • Exploring issues relating to disability cultural competence among practicing physicians

      2019, Disability and Health Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      Participants described addressing a caregiver rather than the patient and wanting to sedate patients to perform routine procedures. Physicians commonly assumed that patients with intellectual disability cannot make responsible decisions about their care,34 although techniques exist that can support their decision-making.35 Approaches also exist to facilitate interactions with persons with serious mental illness.36

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text