‘I beg your pardon?’ Nurses’ experiences in facilitating doctors’ learning process – An interview study
Introduction
Most palliative patients prefer to be cared for at home by their general practitioner (GP) until death [1]. To tackle this complex task, GPs need a set of palliative care competences [2], [3]. A recent review of palliative care education in Europe shows that not all medical schools have a mandatory undergraduate palliative education: in only 47% of the countries palliative care is taught as a subject (mandatory or optional) [4]. Furthermore in Belgium, where our study was done, the offer of continuing medical education (accounting for the lifelong learning of physicians) shows to be insufficient to train GPs in palliatieve care [5]. Therefore GPs have difficulties maintaining palliative care competences. In many countries GPs can appeal to specialized nurses from palliative home care teams (PHCTs) to support them when care becomes too complex or exceeds their own competences [4]. Besides being supported in the delivery of patient care, GPs state to learn through this collaboration [6]. They mention to gain new knowledge by asking on-the-spot advice. Furthermore they state to acquire practical skills by performing technical tasks (e.g. handling a syringe driver) together and under the supervision of the PHCT nurses. This ‘learning by doing’ is also called workplace learning (WPL). Literature on WPL describes characteristics of the learner (who is learning?), the learning context (the practice environment where the working and learning takes place), the learning process (which learning activities are used?), and the learning facilitator (from whom has been learned or who is helping the learning process?) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. To have an effective learning process, ideally the learner needs the willingness to learn, has to be aware of his own learning needs and needs to seize learning opportunities actively [10], [13], [14], [15]. Since most of the WPL occurs during daily work activities, the practice organization should ideally offer a wide range of challenging activities and opportunities to learn, while providing time and space for reflection [8], [10], [11], [16], [17]. The learning process is often unscheduled, informal and implicit or encompasses the use of tacit knowledge, therefore it can be hypothesized that not all learning opportunities are seized [9]. It might be hypothesized that making the implicit learning more explicit (by introducing the role of a learning facilitator) could make it more efficient. The learning facilitator can be any colleague on the work floor. He can help the learner with his needs assessment, solve problems jointly, share materials and resources and give feedback [8], [14], [18], [19]. Essential for facilitators is the need to be skilled (both as an expert in the job and as a facilitator) and motivated to act as a facilitator. PHCT nurses are trained and experienced palliative care experts. They are however not trained for the role of learning facilitator for physicians. Since GPs indicate the collaboration with PHCT nurses to be a learning moment, it is worthwhile to explore the views of the nurses toward their role as facilitator of GPs’ learning. Introducing this new role in their daily task must be done with respect to their views.
The aim of this study was to
- •
Describe the views and preferences of PHCT nurses toward sharing their knowledge and expertise with GPs.
- •
Describe the views and preferences of PHCT nurses toward the balance between care for the patient and care for the team.
- •
Describe how these views and preferences influence the uptake of a role as facilitator of GPs’ learning.
Section snippets
Setting and sample
This interview study is part of a larger study (the ELICIT-study) on primary palliative care in Belgium. The ELICIT-study explores the learning impact of inter-professional collaboration and has been designed as a randomized controlled trial. The entire Dutch speaking part of Belgium is covered by 15 PHCTs. Nurses from these teams advise and support GPs in their caring for palliative patients. Final responsibility remains with the GPs. A large part of them is still working in single handed
Results
Twenty-one nurses participated (age: M 46.0 (SD 7.7); years in PHCT practice: M 6.8 (SD 5.3); gender: Male 3). Fourteen nurses did not participate in the interviews due to change of job (n = 1), long term sick leave (n = 2) and workload too high (n = 11). All interviews took 30–60 min with a mean of 41 min. Details on the participants are shown in Table 2.
The following results are presented with illustrative quotes from participants. Each quote is identified by gender, age and years of experience.
All
Discussion
The strong focus on quality of patient care, identifiable among all participants, is a well-known aspect of the nurses’ profession. Graduating nurses, early career nurses and experienced nurses have been shown to share this focus as their core business [25], [26], [27]. Our study shows that even highly specialized nurses with a specific task (supporting and advising other health care professionals) keep valuing this objective.
In answer to the first research question, analysis reveals how the
Funding
Funding was received for this study by the Vlaamse Liga tegen Kanker.
Conflicts of interest
No conflicts reported.
References (37)
- et al.
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review
Int J Nurs Stud
(2008) - et al.
Introducing and developing nurse leadership through a learning set approach
Nurse Educ Today
(2004) The lived experience of the transition of the clinical nurse expert to the novice nurse educator
Teach Learn Nurs
(2013)- et al.
Assisting nurses to facilitate student and new graduate learning in practice settings: what ‘support’ do nurses at the bedside need?
Nurse Educ Pract
(2013) - et al.
Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review
BMC Palliat Care
(2013) - et al.
(a) Core competencies in palliative care: an EAPC White Paper on palliative care education – part 1
Eur J Palliat Care
(2013) - et al.
(b) Core competencies in palliative care: an EAPC White Paper on palliative care education – part 1
Eur J Palliat Care
(2013) - et al.
EAPC atlas of palliative care in Europe 2013 – full edition
(2013) - et al.
Healthcare professionals’ perceptions toward interprofessional collaboration in palliative home care: a view from Belgium
J Interprof Care
(2013)
Health care professionals’ perceptions towards lifelong learning in palliative care for general practitioners: a focus group study
BMC Fam Pract
Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation
Toward a workplace pedagogy: guidance, participation, and engagement
Adult Educ Quart
Informal learning in the workplace
Stud Cont Educ
Learning from other people in the workplace
Oxford Rev Educ
Physician communities of practice: where learning and practice are inseparable
J Contin Educ Health
Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: a literature review
Vocations Learning
I don’t think I am a learner: acts of naming learners at work
J Workplace Learn
Cited by (10)
The co-learning process in healthcare professionals: Assessing user satisfaction in virtual communities of practice
2015, Computers in Human BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Fung-Kee et al. (2008) indicate benefits directly related to activity and the outcome of the health institution, such as increasing productivity and saving time and economic costs (Díaz-Chao et al., 2014; Massingham & Massingham, 2014; Ranmuthugala et al., 2011; Schenkel & Teigland, 2008). Meanwhile, at the strategic level, developing intellectual capital (Paype et al., 2014¸ Parboosingh, 2002) and relational capital (Adams et al., 2012; Egan & Jaye, 2009; Ryan, Puri, & Liu, 2013) in the institution favors the increase of involvement of health personnel, and the level of competitiveness of the institution. Belonging to a VCoP also favors the creation of social capital, derived from the network of people who make up the community, and between which creates trust and commitment.
Learning With Patients, Students, and Peers: Continuing Professional Development in the Solo Practitioner Workplace
2020, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health ProfessionsDevelopment of a Clinical Teaching Unit in Internal Medicine to Promote Interprofessional and Multidisciplinary Learning: A Practical Intervention
2020, Teaching and Learning in MedicineInterprofessional collaboration within fluid teams: Community nurses' experiences with palliative home care
2019, Journal of Clinical NursingHealthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: Understanding team behaviour through team members' perception of interpersonal interaction
2018, BMC Health Services Research