New directions in eHealth communication: Opportunities and challenges

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This article reviews key communication issues involved in the design of effective and humane eHealth applications to help guide strategic development and implementation of health information technologies.

Background

There is a communication revolution brewing in the delivery of health care and the promotion of health fueled by the growth of powerful new health information technologies.

Conclusion

The development, adoption, and implementation of a broad range of new eHealth applications (such as online health information websites, interactive electronic health records, health decision support programs, tailored health education programs, health care system portals, mobile health communication programs, and advanced telehealth applications) holds tremendous promise to increase consumer and provider access to relevant health information, enhance the quality of care, reduce health care errors, increase collaboration, and encourage the adoption of healthy behaviors.

Practice implications

With the growth of new and exciting health information technology opportunities, however, comes the daunting responsibility to design interoperable, easy to use, engaging, and accessible eHealth applications that communicate the right information needed to guide health care and health promotion for diverse audiences.

Introduction

There is a communication revolution brewing in the modern health care system fueled by the growth of powerful new health information technologies (HITs) that hold tremendous promise for enhancing the delivery of health care and the promotion of health. The development, adoption, and implementation of a broad range of new eHealth applications, such as ubiquitous health information websites (such as Medline Plus, Healthfinder, and Web MD), online social support networks, interactive electronic health records, health decision support systems, tailored health education programs, health care system web portals, mobile health communication devices, and advanced telehealth applications, promise to increase consumer and provider access to relevant health information, enhance the quality of care, reduce health care errors, increase collaboration, and encourage the adoption of healthy behaviors [1]). With the growth of new and exciting HIT opportunities, however, comes the daunting responsibility to design eHealth tools that communicate effectively with a diverse array of health care consumers, providers, and policy makers. These tools must be designed to effectively communicate the right information needed by different audiences at the right time, in the right place, and in the best ways to guide health care and health promotion. eHealth tools need to be interactive, interoperable, easy to use, engaging, adaptable, and accessible for diverse audiences [2], [3]. This article reviews key communication issues involved in the design of effective and humane eHealth applications to help guide strategic development and implementation of HITs that will really improve the quality of care and the promotion of health.

While more health care consumers and providers now understand that communication is a central social process in the provision of health care delivery and the promotion of public health, many do not always recognize that effective communication is a complex and fragile human process that demands strategic design, careful monitoring, and responsive adaptation [4], [5], [6]. This is particularly true in the development and implementation of new health information technologies. Often, it appears that eHealth designers are more enamored with the technical elegance and innovation of new information technologies than with the utility of these tools for health care consumers and providers. Are the technologies easy for these audiences to understand and use? Do the new eHealth tools fit comfortably within the policies, practices, and technical infrastructure that are built into existing health and social systems? Are these new tools affordable and accessible for all intended audiences? Are the messages delivered on eHealth programs designed so that diverse populations of users can understand and apply the health information provided? Are the information systems adaptive, interactive, and self-correcting? Do they provide interesting, relevant, and engaging information for users? Too often, the answers to these questions are disappointing.

Section snippets

Information technologies and behavioral health

eHealth tools have tremendous potential to encourage adoption of healthy behaviors by consumers to promote disease prevention, health promotion, and early detection [1]. Key behavioral factors (such as problematic lifestyle choices concerning diet, exercise, alcohol use, tobacco use, drug use, sexual practices, and exposure to environmental risks) are key contributors to many worldwide health problems (including obesity, injuries, diabetes, heart disease, alcoholism, sexually transmitted

The promise of eHealth communication

Since its inception in the late 1980s, eHealth communication has been thought to have great promise to improve upon traditional heath communication through user-centered design and interactivity, broad social connectivity, deeper understanding of what motivates behavior change beyond “risk,” and the use of multimodal media that expand people's access to health information and discourse across time, place, and cultures [15]. eHealth communication offers opportunities for customization that were

Evidence from eHealth research on interventions?

In 2003, we reviewed the outcomes of the first decade of eHealth interventions and found promising results, particularly in the use of computer-controlled telephone counselling, personally tailored communication, and online support groups for promoting health [15]. These outcomes were linked to key eHealth features of enhanced user control, interactivity, information customization, and social networking. We tempered our general conclusions with important caveats that not all studies showed

Challenges to the development of effective eHealth communication interventions

Based upon our review of the relevant literature evaluating the applications of eHealth interventions we have identified four major communication directions for designing HITs to achieve their full potential for promoting health. First, eHealth interventions must be designed to maximize interactive communication with users to encourage their active involvement in health care and health promotion. Second, HITs must be designed to work effectively and transparently across different communication

Discussion

The historic growth of health information technologies provides tremendous opportunities to combine the eHealth features of interactivity, customization, contextualization, and multimedia that have been touted as having the potential to revolutionize health communication. The first 15 years of eHealth research document that our efforts to bridge the theoretical potential and empirical reality of computer-mediated communication are gradually being realized. The promising, but limited, results of

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Role of the funding source

There is no external funding supporting the preparation of this manuscript.

References (91)

  • G.F. Dunton et al.

    A tailored Internet-plus-email intervention for increasing physical activity among ethnically-diverse women

    Prevent Med

    (2008)
  • V. van der Meer et al.

    Internet-based self-management offers an opportunity to achieve better asthma control in adolescents

    Chest

    (2007)
  • L. Neuhauser et al.

    Ehealth communication and behavior change: promise and performance

    Social Semiotics

    (2010)
  • L. Neuhauser et al.

    The advent of e-health: how interactive media are transforming health communication

    Medien & Kommunikations-Wissenchaft

    (2003)
  • G.L. Kreps

    Strategic use of communication to market cancer prevention and control to vulnerable populations

    Health Market Quart

    (2008)
  • G.L. Kreps

    The pervasive role of information in health care: implications for health communication policy

  • G.L. Kreps et al.

    Health communication as applied communication inquiry

  • World Health Organization

    The global burden of disease. Update ed

    (2008)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Fulfilling the potential of cancer prevention and early detection

    (2003)
  • US Department of Health and Human Services

    Healthy people 2010: conference edition, Volume I [and] Volume II

    (2000)
  • US Department of Health and Human Services

    Progress review: nutrition and overweight

    (2008)
  • US Department of Health and Human Services

    Progress review: diabetes

    (2008)
  • US Department of Health and Human Services

    Progress review: physical activity and fitness

    (2008)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Health and behavior: the interplay of biological, behavioral and societal influences

    (2001)
  • B.D. Smedley et al.

    Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research

    Institute of Medicine

    (2000)
  • L. Neuhauser et al.

    Rethinking communication in the e-health era

    J Health Psych

    (2003)
  • P. Hawe

    Making sense of context-level influences on health

    Health Educ Res

    (1998)
  • L. Neuhauser

    Participatory design for better interactive health communication: a statewide model in the U.S.A.

    Electron J Commun

    (2001)
  • A. Rubin et al.

    Interface of personal and mediated communication: 15 years later

    Electron J Commun

    (2001)
  • J.B. Walther

    Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction

    Commun Res

    (1996)
  • Pew Internet & American Life Project. Surveys March 2000–2009 [Surveys] http://www.pewinternet.org. (Accessed July 31,...
  • Internet World Stats News 38, 2009. Downloaded from the Internet at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/pr/edi038.htm on...
  • H.K. Andreassen et al.

    European citizens’ use of E-health services: a study of seven countries

    BMC Public Health

    (2007)
  • Wangberg S, Andreassen H, Kummervold P, Wynn R, Sorensen T. Use of the Internet for health purposes: trends in Norway...
  • Fox S, Jones S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Internet & American Life Project 2009....
  • E.B. Beckjord et al.

    Use of the Internet to communicate with health care providers in the United States: estimates from the 2003 and 2005 Health Information National Trends Surveys (HINTS)

    J Med Internet Res

    (2007)
  • T. Hong

    Internet health information in the patient–provider dialogue

    CyberPsychol Behav

    (2008)
  • S.A. Rains

    Perceptions of traditional information sources and use of the world wide web to seek health information: findings from the health information national trends survey

    J Health Commun

    (2007)
  • S.A. Iverson et al.

    Impact of Internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient–physician relationship: a survey-based study and review

    J Am Osteopathic Assoc

    (2008)
  • E. Murray et al.

    Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2005)
  • J. Kivits

    Informed patients and the Internet: a mediated context for consultations with health professionals

    J Health Psych

    (2006)
  • B.W. Hesse et al.

    Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey

    Arch Internal Med

    (2005)
  • S. Santana

    Trends of internet use for health matters in Portugal: 2005–2007

    Acta Médica Portuguesa

    (2009)
  • N. Nijland et al.

    Evaluation of internet-based technology for supporting self-care: problems encountered by patients and caregivers when using self-care applications

    J Med Internet Res

    (2008)
  • L.M. Neville et al.

    Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review

    Health Educ Res

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text