Patient Education and Counseling
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 357-364 , March 2010

The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: Do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions?

  • Hilary L. Bekker

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence author at: Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS2 9 LJ, UK. Tel.: +44 0113 343 2726.

Received 23 April 2009 ,Revised 14 January 2010 ,Accepted 17 January 2010.

References 

  1. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Lilleyman J, et al. Informed decision making: an annotated bibliography and systematic review. UK: NHS R&D; 1999;Health Technology Assessment Number 3
  2. O’Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: a systematic review. Brit Med J. 1999;319:731–734
  3. Medical Research Council . Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. 2008;www.mrc.ac.uk/complexinterventionsguidance
  4. O’Connor AM, Drake ER, Fiset V, graham ID, Laupacis A, Tugwell P. The ottawa patient decision aids. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:163–170
  5. Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. Brit Med J. 2006;333:417
  6. Légaré F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–535
  7. Morris D, Drake A, Saarimaki A, Bennett C, O’Connor A. Can people find patient decision aids on the internet?. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:557–560
  8. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD. Challenges for designing and implementing decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;54:265–273
  9. Holmes-Rovner M, Nelson WL, Pignone M, Elwyn G, Rovner DR, O’Connor AM, et al. Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS symposium. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:599–608
  10. O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, Barry M, Col NF, Eden K, et al. Decisions aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions (review). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2009;
  11. Coulter A, Entwistle V, Glibert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?. Br Med J. 1999;318:318–322
  12. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner Mark , Mooney A. Evaluating the quality of patient information provided by Renal Units across the UK. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:2291–2296
  13. Wong SM, Bekker HL, Thornton JG, Gbolade B. Choices about termination method: assessing the quality of patient information in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:263–266
  14. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination . Effective healthcare: getting evidence into practice. vol. 5. 1999;p. 1
  15. NICE . How to change practice: understand, identify and overcome barriers to change. London: NICE; 2007;
  16. O’Donnell S, Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, Graham ID, O’Connor AM, Tugwell P. Understanding and overcoming the barriers of implementing patient decision aids in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2006;12:174–181
  17. O’Connor AM, Jacobson MJ, Stacey D. Ottawa personal decision guide. Ottawa: Ottawa Health Research Institute; 2006;
  18. Ottawa Health Research Institute . Toolkit resources. 2009;http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/resources.html
  19. O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomans H, Stacey D. IPDAS collaboration background document. 2005;http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Background.pdf
  20. O’Connor , Wennberg JE, Légaré F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, et al. Toward the ‘tipping point’: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff. 2007;716–725
  21. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff , Elbourne D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomised trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–694
  22. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191–1194
  23. Durand M-A, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Where is the theory? Evaluating the theoretical frameworks described in decision support technologies. Patent Educ Couns. 2008;71:125–135
  24. Durand MA, Boivin J, Elwyn G. A review of decision support technologies for amniocentesis. Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14:659–668
  25. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. Patients’ health-care decision making: a framework for descriptive and experimental investigations. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:101–106
  26. Bekker HL, Hewison J, Thornton JG. Understanding why decision aids work: linking process and outcome. Patent Educ Couns. 2003;50:323–329
  27. Bekker HL, Winterbottom A, Mooney A. Patient information and decision making process (editorial). Br J Renal Med. 2009;14:28–30
  28. Bekker HL. Using decision making theory to inform clinical practice. In:  Edwards A,  Elwyn G editor. Shared decision making in health care—achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed.. London: OUP; 2009;[chapter 7]
  29. Llewellyn-Thomas HA. The decision lab. In:  Edwards A,  Elwyn G editor. Shared decision making in health care—achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed.. London: OUP; 2009;[chapter 34]
  30. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–661
  31. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T, O’Brien MA. Treatment decision aids: conceptual issues and future directions. Health Expect. 2005;8:114–125
  32. Siminoff LA, Step MM. A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions. Health Psychol. 2005;24(Suppl. 4):S99–S105
  33. Rapley T, May C, Heaven B, Murtagh M, Graham R, Kaner FS, et al. Doctor–patient interaction in a randomised controlled trial of decision-support tools. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2267–2278
  34. Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere M-O. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing?. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:539–547
  35. Entwistle VA. Patient involvement in decision-making: the importance of a broad conceptualisation. In:  Edwards A,  Elwyn G editor. Shared decision making in health care—achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed.. London: OUP; 2009;[chapter 3]
  36. Lomas J. The in-between world of knowledge brokering. Br Med J. 2007;334:129–134
  37. Fischhoff B. Decision research strategies. Health Psychol. 2005;(Suppl. 4):S9–S16
  38. Bryant L, Bown N, Bekker HL. The lure of patient choice (comment). Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57:822–826
  39. Greener I. Towards a history of choice in UK health policy. Sociol Health Ill. 2009;31:309–324
  40. Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, McIssac K, Austoker J, Charvet A, Hewitson P, et al. A systematic review of information in decision aids. Health Expect. 2006;10:46–61
  41. Hogarth RM. Judgment and choice. 2nd ed.. UK: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.; 1988;
  42. Simon HA. Rationality as process and as product of thought. In:  Bell DE,  Raiffa H,  Tversky A editor. Decision making: descriptive, normative and prescriptive interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988;
  43. Baron J . Thinking and deciding. 2nd ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994;
  44. Payne JW, Bettman JR. Walking with the scarecrow: the information-processing approach to decision research. In:  Koehler DJ,  Harvey N editor. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.; 2004;[chapter 6]
  45. Legrenzi P, Girotto V, Johnson-Laird PN. Focussing in reasoning and decision making. Cognition. 1993;49:37–66
  46. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 1974;185:1124–1131
  47. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453–458
  48. Tversky A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. J Business. 1986;59:S251–278
  49. Fischhoff B. Heuristics and biases in application. In:  Gilovich T,  Griffin D,  Kahneman D editor. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;[chapter 41]
  50. Hammond KR. Beyond rationality: the search for wisdom in a troubled time. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007;
  51. Gigerenzer G, Czerlinski J, Martignon L . How goods are fast and frugal heuristics. In:  Gilovich T,  Griffin D,  Kahneman D editor. Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002;[chapter 31]
  52. Siminoff LA, Fetting JH. Effects of outcome framing on treatment decisions in the real-world: impact of framing on adjuvant breast cancer decisions. Med Decis Making. 1989;1089(9):262–271
  53. Chapman GB, Elstein AS. Cognitive processes and biases in medical decision making. In:  Chapman GB,  Sonnenberg FA editor. Decision making in health care: theory, psychology and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000;[chapter 7]
  54. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Covey J, Matthews E, Pill R. Presenting risk information—a review of the effects of “framing” and other manipulations on patient outcomes. J Health Commun. 2001;6:61–82
  55. Moxey A, O’Connell D, McGettigean , Henry D. Describing treatment effects to patients: how they are expressed makes a difference. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:948–959
  56. Stiggelbout AM . Assessing patients’ PReferences. In:  Chapman GB,  Sonnenberg FA editor. Decision making in health care: theory, psychology and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000;[chapter 11]
  57. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, McGreal MJ, Thiel EC. Cancer patients decision making and trial-entry pReferences the effects of “framing” information about short-term toxicity and long-term survival. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:4–12
  58. O’Connor AM. Effects of framing and level of probability on patients’ preferences for cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:119–126
  59. Epstein RA, Alper BS, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. J Am Med Assoc. 2004;2359–2366
  60. Abhyankar P, Bekker HL, Summers BA, Velikova G. Does framing trial participation choices in different ways affect informed decision making: an experimental study?. In: 4th international shared decision making conference abstracts. 2007;
  61. Lipkus IM. Numeric, verbal and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:696–713
  62. Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Bruce and Company; 1993;
  63. Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:752–766
  64. Janis IL, Mann L. Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice and commitment. New York: The Free Press; 1977;
  65. Edwards W, Fasolo B. Decision technology. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52:581–606
  66. Acker F. New findings on unconscious versus conscious thought in decision making: additional empirical data and meta-analysis. Jud Decis Making. 2008;3:292–303
  67. Bekker HL. Genetic screening: facilitating informed choices. In:  Cooper DN,  Thomas N editor. Nature encyclopaedia of the human genome. New York: Nature Publishing Group-Macmillan Publishers Ltd.; 2003;p. 926–930
  68. Kenen R, Ardern-Jones A, Eeeles R. Family stories and the use of heuristics: women from suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families. Sociol Health Ill. 2003;25:838–865
  69. Snowden C, Elbourne D, Garcia J. It was a snap decision: parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2279–2290
  70. Steginga SK, Occhipinti S. The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2004;24:573–583
  71. Fraenkel L, McGraw S, Wongcharatrawee S, Garcia-Tsao G. What do patients consider when making decision about treatment for hepatitis C?. Am J Med. 2005;118:1387–1391
  72. Frisch D, Jones SK. Assessing the accuracy of decisions. Theory Psychol. 1993;3:115–135
  73. Larrick RP. Debiasing. In:  Koehler DJ,  Harvey N editor. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing; 2004;[chapter 16]
  74. Carrigan N, Gardner PH, Conner M, Maule J. The impact of structuring information in a patient decision aid. Psychol Health. 2004;19:457–477
  75. Loewenstein G. Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychol. 2005;24:S49–S56
  76. Gino F, Moore DA. Effects of task difficulty on use of advice. J Behav Decis Making. 2007;20:21–35
  77. Sher S, McKenzie CRM. Information leakage from logically equivalent frames. Cognition. 2006;101:467–494
  78. Maule J, Villejoubert G. What lies beneath?. Think Reason. 2007;13:25–44
  79. Covey J. A meta-analysis of the effects of presenting treatment benefits in different formats. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:638–654
  80. Jones SK, Frisch D, Urak TJ, Kim E. Choices and opportunities: another effect of framing decisions. J Behav Decis Making. 1998;11:211–216
  81. Nelson WL, Han PHJ, Fagerlin A, Stefanek M, Ubel P. Rethinking the objectives of decision aids: a call for conceptual clarity. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:609–618
  82. Epstein RM, Franks P, Fiscella K, Shields CG, Meldrum SC, Kracvitz RL, et al. Measuring patient-centred communication in patient-physician consultations: theoretical and practical issues. Soc Sci Med. 2005;62:1516–1528
  83. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patent Educ Couns. 2006;60:301–312
  84. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:892–897
  85. Entwistle VA, Sheldon TA, Sowden AJ, Watt IS. Supporting consumer involvement in decision making: what constitutes quality in consumer health information. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996;8:425–437
  86. Frisch D, Clemen RT. Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioural decision research. Psychol Bull. 1994;116:46–54
  87. Yates JF, Veinott ES, Patalano AL. Hard decisions, bad decisions: on decision quality decision aiding. In:  Schneider SL,  Shanteau J editor. Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge University Press; 2003;[chapter 1]
  88. Zey M. Criticisms of rational choice models. In:  Zey M editors. Decision making: alternatives to rational choice models, Newbury park. California: SAGE Publications Inc.; 1992;
  89. Sox HC. What makes a good decision. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2:196–197
  90. Holmes-Rovner M, Rovner DR. Measuring improved patient choice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6:263–272
  91. Bekker HL, Légaré F, Stacey D, O’Connor A, Lemyre L. Is anxiety an appropriate measure of decision aid effectiveness: a systematic review?. Patent Educ Couns. 2003;50:255–262
  92. Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Smart choices: a practical guide to making better decisions. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1999;
  93. Sepucha K, Ozanne EM. How to define and measure concordance between patients’ preferences and medical treatments: a systematic review of approaches and recommendations for standardization. Patent Educ Couns. 2009;78:12–23
  94. O’Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25–30
  95. O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ. Workbook on developing and evaluating patient decision aids, 2003. http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/Develop_DA.pdf.
  96. Bekker HL, Thornton JG, Hewison J. Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down's syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Prenatal Diag. 2004;24:265–275
  97. Stalmeier PFM, Roosmalen MS. Concise evaluation of decision aids. Patent Educ Couns. 2009;74:104–109
  98. Wong SSM, Thornton JG, Gbolade B, Bekker HL. A randomised controlled trial of a decision aid leaflet to facilitate women's choice between pregnancy termination methods. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;113:688–695
  99. Abhyankar P, Bekker HL, Summers BA, Velikova G. Why values elicitation techniques enable people to make informed decisions about cancer trial participation—a randomised controlled study. Health Expect, in press.
  100. Fagerlin A. Getting down to details in the design and use of decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2009;29:409–411
  101. Wegwarth O, Gigerenzer G. A preference does not equate with understanding—Commentary on Patients prefer pictures to numbers to express cardiovascular benefit from treatment. In: Goodyear-Smith F., et al., editors. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:213–17.
  102. Winterbottom A, Bekker HL, Conner M, Mooney A. Does narrative information bias individual's decision making? A systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:2079–2088
  103. Ryan M, Scott DA, Reeves C, Bate A, van Teijlingen ER, Russell EM, et al. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques. Health Tech Assess. 2001;5:[report 5]
  104. Elwyn G, O’Connor A. The international patient decision aids standards (IPDAS) collaboration: the checklist, the instrument, and the next steps. In:  Edwards A,  Elwyn G editor. Shared decision making in health care—achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed.. London: OUP; 2009;[chapter 33]
  105. Elwyn G, O’Connor A, Frosch D, Volk R, Feldman-Stewart D. Decision aids and beyond: the next decade of decision support technologies. In:  Edwards A,  Elwyn G editor. Shared decision making in health care—achieving evidence-based patient choice. 2nd ed.. London: OUP; 2009;[chapter 54]
  106. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect. 2001;4:99–108
  107. Marshall SS, Haywood KL, Fitzpatrick R. Patient involvement and collaboration in shared decision-making: a structured review to inform chronic disease management. Report from the Patient-assessed health instruments group to the Department of Health. 2005, http://phi.uhce.ox.ac.uk.
  108. Britt E, Hudson SM, Blampied NM. Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review. Patent Educ Couns. 2004;53:147–155
  109. Van Dulmen S, Sluijs E, van Dijk L, de Ridder D, Heerdink R, Bensing J. Patient adherence to medical treatment: a review of reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:55
  110. Winterbottom AE, Bekker HL, Conner Mark , Mooney A. Using narratives in dialysis decision aids: help or hindrance?. In: 5th international shared decision making conference abstracts. 2009;
  111. Ley P. Communicating with patients: improving communication, satisfaction and compliance. London: Croom Helm Ltd.; 1988;

PII: S0738-3991(10)00008-X

doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.002

Patient Education and Counseling
Volume 78, Issue 3 , Pages 357-364 , March 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution